[swift-evolution] [Draft] Allow trailing commas in argument lists
Dave Abrahams
dabrahams at apple.com
Wed Mar 9 16:17:18 CST 2016
on Wed Mar 09 2016, Radosław Pietruszewski <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> JavaScript’s common convention (and weird looking!) to use leading
> commas is exactly because it can’t do trailing commas.
The reason I've seen for leading commas is that to add a new element to
the end of a list, you only need to change one line instead of two.
> Swift already allows trailing commas in arrays. Even if not everyone
> will know or use this, I see zero harm in allowing trailing commas in
> argument lists and tuples.
>
> +1. Because Why Not™.
>
> — Radek
>
>> On 09 Mar 2016, at 13:54, Nisse Bergman via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> -1
>> Let’s not go down this path and enable the javascript flamewar of trailing or non-trailing commas.
>>
>> Nisse
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 09 Mar 2016, at 01:23, Joe Groff via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes please.
>>>
>>>> On Mar 8, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Grant Paul via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ## Introduction
>>>>
>>>> Right now, Swift argument lists are not permitted to contain trailing commas. To make multi-line calls easier, we propose allowing trailing commas in argument (and tuple) syntax:
>>>>
>>>> let person = Person(
>>>> id: json['id'],
>>>> name: json['name'],
>>>> picture: Im2age(picture),
>>>> friends: friends,
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ## Motivation
>>>>
>>>> It’s common for functions to take a number of arguments. In some languages, this can make it difficult to figure out what a function does, leading to patterns like fluent interfaces and configuration objects.
>>>>
>>>> Swift, by contrast, handles this very well. Argument labels make sure parameters aren’t confused even when they’re of the same type. And compared to Objective-C, it’s much easier to write a multi-line list of arguments in Swift.
>>>>
>>>> However, with a parentheses placement style placing the closing parentheses for a multi-line call on a new line, Swift does not support a trailing comma. Trailing commas have a number of benefits:
>>>>
>>>> - It is easier to re-arrange lines (especially in certain text editors) when all lines have commas.
>>>> - Line-based diffs (as used by most source control systems) only show added lines when adding a new parameter to the end, rather than two lines where one just adds the comma.
>>>> - It’s more consistent with other Swift lists which do support trailing commas.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ## Proposed Solution
>>>>
>>>> The proposed solution is to allow and ignore trailing commas in argument lists and tuples:
>>>>
>>>> let person = Person(
>>>> id: json['id'],
>>>> name: json['name'],
>>>> picture: Image(picture),
>>>> friends: friends,
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> let tuple = (
>>>> color,
>>>> 32,
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ## Detailed Design
>>>>
>>>> Support for trailing commas in argument lists and tuples would make them consistent with Swift’s handling of array literals, which do support trailing commas:
>>>>
>>>> let array = [
>>>> 2,
>>>> 4,
>>>> 8,
>>>> ]
>>>>
>>>> There should not be any impact to existing code from this proposal.
>>>>
>>>> Support for this syntax is also found in other programming languages like Python, D, and Hack. It’s been proposed for JavaScript (positive response) and PHP (rejected):
>>>>
>>>> - JavaScript: https://jeffmo.github.io/es-trailing-function-commas/
>>>> - PHP: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/trailing-comma-function-args
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ## Alternatives Considered
>>>>
>>>> The main alternative is the existing behavior. This has the benefit of standardizing Swift code on a particular style. However, many people will in practice continue to use a style regardless of support trailing commas, especially for cross-language consistency. It could also lead to JavaScript-inspired parameter ordering:
>>>>
>>>> let person =
>>>> Person(id: json['id']
>>>> , name: json['name']
>>>> , picture: Image(picture)
>>>> , friends: friends)
>>>>
>>>> Another alternative would be to support this syntax for function parameters but not tuples. However, this would be an arbitrary inconsistency.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
--
-Dave
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list