[swift-evolution] For-loop revisited

[Maximilian Hünenberger]

Oh... Missed that change. But my point still stands :)

Best regards
- Maximilian

> Am 08.03.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Erica Sadun <erica at ericasadun.com>:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 8, 2016, at 11:13 AM, Maximilian Hünenberger via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Actually you cannot use the global stride function anymore.
> 
> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0006-apply-api-guidelines-to-the-standard-library.md
> 
>  extension Strideable {
> -  public func stride(to end: Self, by stride: Stride) -> StrideTo<Self>
>  }
> +public func stride<T : Strideable>(from start: T, to end: T, by stride: T.Stride) -> StrideTo<T>
> 
>  extension Strideable {
> -  public func stride(through end: Self, by stride: Stride) -> StrideThrough<Self>
>  }
> +public func stride<T : Strideable>(from start: T, through end: T, by stride: T.Stride) -> StrideThrough<T>
> 
> 
>> I thought a method on "Range" which returns a stride would be easier to grasp:
>> 
>> for x in 0.stride(to: 0.5, by: 0.03) { ... }
>> 
>> // much faster to predict what is does even though it is less clear to a beginner
>> for x in (0 ... 0.5).by(0.03) { ... }
>> 
>> - Maximilian
>> 
>>> Am 08.03.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Антон Жилин <antonyzhilin at gmail.com>:
>>> 
>>> It's already possible:
>>> 
>>> for d in stride(from: 0, to: 5, by: 0.3) {
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Absolutely readable (despite all efforts to break it).
>>> And I would passionately hate the special syntax for floating-point loops in Swift.
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160308/5d9f3456/attachment.html>