[swift-evolution] [Pitch] Instance var/let property as type member could be unbound function
    Tikitu de Jager 
    tikitu at logophile.org
       
    Fri Mar  4 03:24:16 CST 2016
    
    
  
That is, given
     extension Int : CustomStringConvertible {
       var description: Swift.String {
         get {}
       }
     }
my proposal is to expose
     Int.description
as a function with type
     (Int) -> String
This would make var/let properties behave more similarly to func 
properties, where given
extension Int : PartOfRandomAccessIndexType {
   func successor() -> Swift.Int
}
we have
     Int.successor
exposed with type
     (Int) -> () -> Int
Making var/let properties behave "the same" looks more consistent to me, 
but that's as a naive Swift user with no real compiler/language-design 
experience. For the same reason I can't see whether this would impact 
the ABI, whether it's remotely feasible, and even whether what looks 
like "the same" behaviour to me is *really* semantically equivalent. So 
if there is some interest in this idea I'd be happy to work up a formal 
proposal, but I thought I would test the waters first.
Cheers,
Tikitu
-- 
http://www.logophile.org/
@tTikitu
    
    
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list