[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0026 Abstract classes and methods

[David Scrève]

> Le 3 mars 2016 à 22:52, Alsey Miller via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> a écrit :
> 
> Classes are definitely first-class citizens. And I’ll concede that this proposal has its advantages. But I do strongly believe, that in accordance to the roadmap for Swift 3, this should not be accepted, and should instead be introduced in Swift 4. There is a precedence for good proposals being pushed to next year, since Swift 3’s goal is stabilization. 
> 
> 	Coleman,
> 
	abstract classes may have impact on ABI : that’s the reason we may add this in release 3 if we want to be able to introduction binary interrop in Swift 4 (such as dynamic code loading,etc…).

David


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160303/a1039d26/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4233 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160303/a1039d26/attachment.p7s>