[swift-evolution] [Discussion] Enforcing Calling Super

Jean-Daniel Dupas mailing at xenonium.com
Thu Feb 25 13:17:46 CST 2016


> Le 25 févr. 2016 à 16:47, Jeremy Pereira via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> a écrit :
> 
> 
>> On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:26, Kyle Sherman via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for the replies.
>> 
>> Kenny: After thinking about it more, discussing with Peter, and looking Haravikk’s comments, I think the best thing would be for this to be a warning as suggested. I respectfully disagree that as a library creator you would not be able to know that a call to super should be required.
> 
> I disagree. You can’t possibly know all the use-cases in which your class might be subclassed. 
> 
> In particular, it is absurd to enforce having the call to super as the first or last line of the method. That would stop me doing things like this:
> 
>    override func viewDidLoad()
>    {
>        print(“About to run super.viewDidLoad()”)
>        super.viewDidLoad()
>        print(“Finished super.viewDidLoad()”)
>    }
> 
> Then there’s the perfectly reasonable case like this:
> 
>    override func viewDidLoad()
>    {
>        functionThatCallsSuperViewDidLoad()
>    }
> 
> Why shouldn’t I be allowed to do that?

+1 with your concern. I’d be curious to see a single real world use case where enforcing first or last is required.



More information about the swift-evolution mailing list