[swift-evolution] [Discussion] Enforcing Calling Super
swift-evolution at haravikk.me
Wed Feb 17 17:30:13 CST 2016
> On 17 Feb 2016, at 22:26, Kyle Sherman <kyledsherman at gmail.com> wrote:
> Haravikk: I don’t agree with using “(required)” as that will be a sort of overloaded usage of the keyword.
I don’t believe so, at least in the case of a @super attribute, in which case it’s an option of that attribute, so a separate use-case, of course if there’s another term that can be used then I’ve no particular attachment to required, it’s just the most obvious term to me.
While I agree that @super on its own should imply required, I think we should still have the ability to explicitly state that that is the case (personally I prefer to be as clear as possible rather than relying on defaults) in cases like these.
More information about the swift-evolution