[swift-evolution] Analysis of case conventions for initialisms
tanadeau at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 17:44:49 CST 2016
My only strong objection is to option #3. Option 1 is okay. I probably
should have given that a +0 instead of a -1. My preference order is more
<an inch away>
<somewhere around the moon>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> on Thu Feb 11 2016, Dave Abrahams <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> > I just posted a write-up about various case conventions for initialisms:
> > https://gist.github.com/dabrahams/55fc5ece355da4664730. I was surprised
> > at how it turned out, FWIW.
> FYI, it looks like the API guidelines working group has settled on
> convention #1, which is what the standard library currently does.
> Coincidentally, this seems to have resulted in the fewest number of
> strong objections in an area where strong opinions abound (except for
> Trent—sorry, Trent).
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution