[swift-evolution] Analysis of case conventions for initialisms

[Xiaodi Wu]

Yup, I recognize it's all hypothetical for now. Just trying to economize on
words :P

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 10:18 AM Dave Abrahams <dabrahams at apple.com> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my moss-covered three-handled family gradunza
>
> On Feb 12, 2016, at 6:25 AM, Xiaodi Wu <xiaodi.wu at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, by vendor prefix I mean the NS in NSArray, or AV in AVURLAsset,
> etc. Does #2 mean that we are to have AvUrlAsset? Or AVUrlAsset?
>
>
> It's a good question.
>
> BTW, no decision has been made on this yet, in case it wasn't clear to
> you.
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 4:20 AM Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> on Fri Feb 12 2016, Xiaodi Wu <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Based on the examples, #2 does seem to have the most advantages. But:
>> > what to do with vendor prefixes? Are those to be an exception?
>>
>> Can you some examples of a “vendor prefix?”
>>
>> > Another tidbit: .NET seems to have its own exceptions--not sure if
>> > there are rules for them, but just at the namespace level there's
>> > System.IO and UIAutomationClientsideProviders, spelled as shown.
>>
>> Thanks for pointing those out.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
>> > <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> on Fri Feb 12 2016, Rob Mayoff <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I have been using #2 for years in many languages (including
>> Objective-C and
>> >>> more recently Swift) and much prefer it.
>> >>>
>> >>> Incidentally, "ASCII" is one of the examples in the definition of
>> "acronym"
>> >>> in OS X's American English dictionary.
>> >>
>> >> Yup, you're right.
>> >>
>> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:51 PM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
>> >>> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I just posted a write-up about various case conventions for
>> initialisms:
>> >>>> https://gist.github.com/dabrahams/55fc5ece355da4664730.  I was
>> surprised
>> >>>> at how it turned out, FWIW.
>> >>>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> >>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> >>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -Dave
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> swift-evolution mailing list
>> >> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > swift-evolution mailing list
>> > swift-evolution at swift.org
>> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>> --
>> -Dave
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160212/0ae8718a/attachment.html>