[swift-evolution] Analysis of case conventions for initialisms

[Craig Cruden]

Another +1 for #2

> On 2016-02-12, at 16:41:47, Jim Hillhouse via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 for #2. I like 2's clearer word boundaries and continuation of Swift's name type convention.
> 
> Jim
> 
>> On Feb 11, 2016, at 21:51, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I just posted a write-up about various case conventions for initialisms:
>> https://gist.github.com/dabrahams/55fc5ece355da4664730.  I was surprised
>> at how it turned out, FWIW.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> -- 
>> -Dave
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution