[swift-evolution] [RFC] "Library Evolution Support in Swift ('Resilience')"
David Owens II
david at owensd.io
Wed Feb 10 14:45:12 CST 2016
> On Feb 8, 2016, at 6:24 PM, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> This last point is a specific case of a general tenet of Swift: the default behavior is safe. Where possible, choices made when an entity is first published should not limit its evolution in the future.
> Changing or removing a default value is permitted but discouraged; it may break or change the meaning of existing source code.
Maybe I'm being dense, but how is something with a caveat of "discouraged" and "it may break or change" in-line with "the default behavior is safe"? I've got no qualms with putting the default value in the client code; I actually think that is fine.
However, my concern is that you will have different behavior depending on if you simply drop in the updated binary vs recompile against the binary. Even worse if you have multiple components within your app that link against the library. If only one of those components is recompiled on release, you now have a problem of conflicting behavior within your own app because of the client-side calling the API will be using different values.
It would seem that removing the default value could be permitted (though maybe still discouraged) because this will result in a compiler error in the scenario above. It's still possible to have different behavior in your components, but now it's no longer implicitly happening. However, changing the default parameter seems highly problematic.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution