[swift-evolution] Proposal: Pattern Matching Partial Function (#111)
Craig Cruden
ccruden at novafore.com
Thu Feb 4 12:35:32 CST 2016
cases was added instead of using `cases` because of the potential problems foreseen where the parser would have trouble identifying a list of values.
cases would be restricted to key: value, key: value, key: value and would be considered syntactic sugar that would expand out to
case key1: value1
case key2: value2
case key3: value3
as far as the compilation was concerned.
> On 2016-02-05, at 1:31:09, Maximilian Hünenberger via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> I definitely see the point against dictionaries but I’m afraid of the actual pattern matching in "cases".
>
> match(1) {
> case 1, 3: 10
> case 2, 4: 20
> default: 30
> }
>
> // with "cases"
>
> match(1) { cases
> 1, 3: 10,
> 2, 4: 20,
> default: 30
> }
>
> // it is very hard to disambiguate between pattern and return value even though for the compiler it could be doable
> match(1) { cases
> 1, 3: 10, 2, 4: 20, default: 30
> }
>
>
> There should be a more visible distinction between two "case-item-map" like "|". But we have to consider "expression-patterns" where operators (like "|") are ambiguous.
>
> - Maximilian
>
>> Am 04.02.2016 um 18:48 schrieb Paul Ossenbruggen <possen at gmail.com <mailto:possen at gmail.com>>:
>>
>> That is a good point and I forgot about that. There are frequent cases where what I am dealing with is not hashable and it is generally a lot of work to make it hashable, including adding a heading function which if done wrong, can lead to errors.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Charles Constant via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>>> I still vote for keeping "cases"
>>>
>>> I see it as a replacement for dictionary literal "pattern matching":
>>> [1 : "one", 2 : "two", 3 : "three"][1] ?? "undefined"
>>>
>>> A dictionary needs keys that are Hashable. A dictionary produces an optional. We've discussed this, and more, earlier in the thread.
>>>
>>> Even though it would be nice to have but I don’t think that I would use it frequently.
>>>
>>> Granted, it's a bit ugly, but given the choice, I would pick "cases" over "case case case case ..." every time.
>>>
>>> In addition, to be more consistent with "case", "cases" would introduce pattern matching which doesn’t seem right with this concise syntax.
>>>
>>> I haven't thought this through. It just bums me out a little to replace the switch with something that still has imho unnecessary verbosity.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160205/045ace5b/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list