[swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0006 Apply API Guidelines to the Standard Library
erica at ericasadun.com
Sun Jan 31 10:28:36 CST 2016
> Canonical Dave:
>> - use nouns for unambiguously functional items without side effects (distanceTo(), successor)
>> - use verbs for unambiguously procedural items
> This works great so far. I think you can say
> - use nouns for methods with no side effects (or only incidental ones,
> like logging)
> - use verbs for methods with significant side-effects
> and you can stop there. Why does this have to be more complicated than
Because *someone* put mutating/nonmutating rules into the guidelines. And I'm OCD enough that
they are irritating me. It's the mutating/nonmutating bits that I perceive as unneeded hungarianisms that push a
little too far into detailed advice by tying method naming to overly specific fancy rules. (Insert a joke here about
fancy cats and fussy linguistic grooming.)
>> One final point: I think the -ed/-ing advice is wrong. Adding "ed"
>> isn't really creating a past tense verb (reversed).
> No, it's creating the past participle. We had this checked by a
> linguist :-).
This is why I love you guys.
-- E, appreciative
More information about the swift-evolution