dabrahams at apple.com
Thu Jan 28 20:39:14 CST 2016
on Thu Jan 28 2016, Patrick Pijnappel <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> That's looking really good, great work! Any idea how far we are from having
> this in the language?
There are *at least* a couple of weeks' work to clear out the parts
we've decided not to pursue and sculpt a few of the APIs we're not quite
happy with; then it all has to go through review on this list. And of
course, things have a way of coming up, so I would be wary of drawing
any hard conclusions here.
> Kind regards,
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> on Thu Jan 28 2016, James Campbell <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> > I think there is some sort of documentation or work being done on Number
>> > Types in Swift to make it a more robust solution rather than the bunch of
>> > lop-sided classes we have right now.
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
More information about the swift-evolution