[swift-evolution] undefined

[Dave Abrahams]

on Thu Jan 28 2016, Patrick Pijnappel <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:

> That's looking really good, great work! Any idea how far we are from having
> this in the language?

There are *at least* a couple of weeks' work to clear out the parts
we've decided not to pursue and sculpt a few of the APIs we're not quite
happy with; then it all has to go through review on this list.  And of
course, things have a way of coming up, so I would be wary of drawing
any hard conclusions here.

> Kind regards,
> Patrick
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> on Thu Jan 28 2016, James Campbell <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I think there is some sort of documentation or work being done on Number
>> > Types in Swift to make it a more robust solution rather than the bunch of
>> > lop-sided classes we have right now.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/master/test/Prototypes/Integers.swift.gyb
>>
>> HTH,
>>
>> --
>> -Dave
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-- 
-Dave