[swift-evolution] Idea: Let Generic Parameters Have Labels & Default Values
Dave Abrahams
dabrahams at apple.com
Sat Jan 23 16:52:59 CST 2016
on Sat Jan 23 2016, David Sweeris <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> The title seems fairly self-explanatory. Does anyone else think this could be useful?
> struct True : BooleanType {…} // Just part of the example… not in the proposal (although I do like it)
> struct False : BooleanType {…} // Same
> // This is where the actual idea starts
> struct BigInt <BaseType: T = Int, CanEqualZero: U = Yes where T: IntegerArithmeticType, U: BooleanType> {…}
>
> The first parameter label could be skipped (or not), depending on
> whatever the rules for functions parameter labels ends up being
> (either way, they should be the same IMHO). Then variables could be
> declared like this:
> let foo = BigInt() // BigInt<Int, No>()
> let bar = BigInt<Int32>() // For when your data will be processed on a 32-bit platform or something
> let divisor = BigInt<CanEqualZero: False>()
>
> (The obvious follow-up suggestion is to then allow a generic type’s
> definition to change based on the results of logical operations
> performed purely on the types that are passed in, but I think that’s
> getting into “macro system” territory, and should probably be its own
> thing.)
>
> Anyway, thoughts?
>
+1
--
-Dave
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list