[swift-evolution] Proposal: Add scan, takeWhile, dropWhile, and iterate to the stdlib

Seth Friedman sethfri at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 00:26:16 CST 2016


I wasn't suggesting you should convince the reviewers of the merits of
functional style programming. I'm coming at it from the perspective of "Hey
I'm not very familiar with functional style. What cool new things could
these functions help me do if they're added to the stdlib?".

Not all of your reviewers are necessarily going to be familiar with these
functions from other languages; I simply think more detail would make the
proposal more compelling. Ultimately up to you.

Thanks,
Seth
On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 10:20 PM Kevin Ballard <kevin at sb.org> wrote:

> When the proposal is "we have a bunch of functions that match functions
> used in other languages, lets add a few more from the same category of
> functions that we missed", does there really need to be much explanation
> beyond "they're useful in the other languages that have them, they'd be
> useful for the same reasons in Swift"?
>
> If requested, I can provide examples of usage. But if you're not already
> sold on the benefits of working with sequences in a functional manner, it's
> out of scope of the proposal to convince you of the merits of that style of
> programming. And if you are already sold on the benefits of doing so, then
> adding these functions shouldn't need much explanation.
>
> Here's a few toy examples, if it helps:
>
> // list of all powers of 2 below some limit
> iterate(1, apply: { $0 * 2 }).takeWhile({ $0 < limit })
>
> // first "word" of a string, skipping whitespace
> let cs = NSCharacterSet.whitespaceCharacterSet()
> String(str.unicodeScalars.skipWhile({ cs.longCharacterIsMember($0.value) })
>                          .takeWhile({ !cs.longCharacterIsMember($0.value)
> }))
>
> // running total of an array of numbers
> numbers.scan(0, combine: +).dropFirst()
>
> // infinite fibonacci sequence
> iterate((0,1), apply: { ($1, $0+$1) }).lazy.map({$1})
>
> -Kevin Ballard
>
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016, at 09:55 PM, Seth Friedman wrote:
>
> To clear my thoughts up a bit, that wasn't an "I'm too lazy to Google what
> these functions normally do" comment, but rather an "I believe proposals
> should provide as much context as possible about what you'd like to add
> along with the benefits of doing so" comment.
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 9:48 PM Seth Friedman <sethfri at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not familiar with any of the functions listed and would love to see
> more about them and their usefulness to Swift as part of the proposal.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Seth
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 5:30 PM Kevin Ballard via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> Proposal PR submitted as https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/pull/95
>
> -Kevin Ballard
>
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015, at 03:59 PM, Kevin Ballard wrote:
> > ## Introduction
> >
> > Add a few more functional sequence utilities to the standard library.
> >
> > ## Motivation
> >
> > We have map, filter, and reduce, but we're missing a bunch of useful
> utilities like scan, iterate, takeWhile, and dropWhile. Interestingly, the
> stdlib includes an implementation of scan in the doc comment for
> LazySequenceType, it just doesn't actually provide it as API.
> >
> > ## Proposed solution
> >
> > We extend SequenceType with 3 new methods scan, takeWhile, and
> dropWhile. We also add a single global function iterate.
> >
> > ## Detailed design
> >
> > We add the following extension to SequenceType:
> >
> > extension SequenceType {
> >     func scan<T>(initial: T, @noescape combine: (T,
> Self.Generator.Element) throws -> T) rethrows -> [T]
> >     func dropWhile(@noescape dropElement: (Self.Generator.Element)
> throws -> Bool) rethrows -> [Self.Generator.Element]
> >     func takeWhile(@noescape takeElement: (Self.Generator.Element)
> throws -> Bool) rethrows -> [Self.Generator.Element]
> > }
> >
> > These all take functions, so to follow convention they're @noescape and
> return arrays. We also provide an extension of CollectionType that
> overrides a couple of these methods:
> >
> > extension CollectionType {
> >     func dropWhile(@noescape dropElement: (Self.Generator.Element)
> throws -> Bool) rethrows -> Self.SubSequence
> >     func takeWhile(@noescape takeElement: (Self.Generator.Element)
> throws -> Bool) rethrows -> Self.SubSequence
> > }
> >
> > We also provide lazy versions:
> >
> > extension LazySequenceType {
> >     func scan<T>(initial: T, combine: (T, Self.Generator.Element) -> T)
> -> LazyScanSequence<Self.Elements, T>
> >     func dropWhile(dropElement: (Self.Generator.Element) -> Bool) ->
> LazyDropWhileSequence<Self.Elements>
> >     func takeWhile(takeElement: (Self.Generator.Element) -> Bool) ->
> LazyTakeWhileSequence<Self.Elements>
> > }
> >
> > extension LazyCollectionType {
> >     func dropWhile(dropElement: (Self.Generator.Element) -> Bool) ->
> LazyDropWhileCollection<Self.Elements>
> >     func takeWhile(takeElement: (Self.Generator.Element) -> Bool) ->
> LazyTakeWhileCollection<Self.Elements>
> > }
> >
> > No collection variant of scan is provided because that would require
> storing the last value in the index itself, which would cause problems if
> the combine function isn't pure.
> >
> > LazyDropWhileCollection would behave similarly to LazyFilterCollection
> in that it runs the predicate against the elements to drop when accessing
> startIndex; unlike LazyFilterCollection, because there's nothing else to
> skip after that point, the index itself can actually be Self.Elements.Index
> (just like a slice). LazyTakeWhileCollection also runs the predicate
> against the first element when accessing startIndex, but it does need a
> unique index type (because endIndex has to be some sentinel value, as it
> doesn't know where the end is until you reach that point; this index type
> would therefore only conform to ForwardIndexType).
> >
> > And finally, we provide a global function
> >
> > func iterate<T>(initial: T, _ f: T -> T) -> IterateSequence<T>
> >
> > This function is inherently lazy and yields an infinite list of nested
> applications of the function, so iterate(x, f) yields a sequence like [x,
> f(x), f(f(x)), ...].
> >
> > -Kevin Ballard
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160111/9e073986/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list