[swift-evolution] Support for newtype feature/typesafe calculations
Félix Cloutier
felixcca at yahoo.ca
Thu Jan 7 01:06:10 CST 2016
I'd like to hijack this thread to talk about what the TI Voyage 200 could do as far as "type-safe calculations" go.
The calculator supports symbolic equations (for instance, `a * 1000 / 2` results in `500a` when a isn't known). The interesting part is that you could append units to numbers. For instance, you can write `500_m`, and this means 500 meters. Numbers with a type can only be added/subtracted with numbers of the same type, but they can be multiplied or divided by pretty much anything. For instance, `500_m - 2_s` (500 meters minus 2 seconds) is an error, but `500_m / 2_s` is `250 (_m/_s)` (or _m * _s^-1).
I found this *extremely* useful for engineering calculations. For instance, when you multiply quantities that should end up in Teslas, you know that you've done something wrong if the unit displayed after the number doesn't look like `V * s * m^-2`. It was also a lifesaver that you could do something like `6_ft` and end up with 1.8288_m (because _ft is defined as 0.3048_m).
I have no idea how you'd implement that with Swift though. I'm not a very powerful template wizard, but I have no idea how you'd do it with C++ either.
Of course, it might be a few years before you're allowed to use the Swift compiler during your physics exams, and I don't think that real-world programs often need that much unit safety with numbers. But when I read "epic typesafe calculations", that's what I think about.
Félix
> Le 7 janv. 2016 à 01:42:07, Thorsten Seitz via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> a écrit :
>
> I think the name should be changed to NumberBox or something similar. A box is something very generic and should not have number related associated types.
>
> -Thorsten
>
> Am 06. Januar 2016 um 18:15 schrieb James Campbell <james at supmenow.com>:
>
>> I've managed to implement this already in the language with a few ugly corners due to the lack of generic protocols.
>>
>> I created a protocol based on Box (https://github.com/robrix/Box/ <https://github.com/robrix/Box/>) which works really well. I have extended this to handle certain special protocols like Equatable so you can do SpecialType == SpecialType, and even literalConversion.
>>
>> There is however a lot of boilerplate:
>>
>> - You have to declare all of your Convertible protocols for converting from one type to another
>> - You have to define an empty init so the protocol extensions have something to chain to.
>> - You need to write the value property with type.
>>
>> Due to the lack of protocol generics, you also need to have a protocol for every type you wish to box which sets the associated type. Of course I could have done this with classes but I wanted to keep this as a value type :).
>>
>> With member-wise initializations and generic protocols this could be achievable just by adding a Box protocol to the standard library.
>>
>> Here is my implementation of Box as a protocol:
>>
>> protocol Box: CustomStringConvertible, CustomDebugStringConvertible {
>>
>>
>>
>> typealias FloatLiteralType = Double
>>
>> typealias IntegerLiteralType = Int
>>
>> typealias BoxType = Any
>>
>>
>>
>> var value: BoxType { get set }
>>
>>
>>
>> init()
>>
>> init(_ value: BoxType)
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> extension Box where BoxType: CustomStringConvertible {
>>
>>
>>
>> var description: String {
>>
>> return self.value.description
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> var debugDescription: String {
>>
>> return "\(self.value.description)㎭"
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> //MARK: FloatingPointBox
>>
>>
>>
>> protocol FloatingPointBox: Box, FloatLiteralConvertible, IntegerLiteralConvertible {
>>
>>
>>
>> typealias BoxType = Double
>>
>> typealias FloatLiteralConvertible = Double
>>
>> typealias IntegerLiteralConvertible = Int
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> extension Box where Self.BoxType == Double {
>>
>>
>>
>> init(_ value: Double) {
>>
>>
>>
>> self.init()
>>
>> self.value = value
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> init(_ value: Int) {
>>
>>
>>
>> self.init()
>>
>> self.value = Double(value)
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> extension FloatLiteralType {
>>
>>
>>
>> init<T: Box where T.BoxType == Double >(_ box: T) {
>>
>> self.init(box.value)
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> init<T: Box where T.BoxType == Int >(_ box: T) {
>>
>> self.init(box.value)
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> extension CGFloat {
>>
>>
>>
>> init<T: Box where T.BoxType == Double >(_ box: T) {
>>
>> self.init(box.value)
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> init<T: Box where T.BoxType == Int >(_ box: T) {
>>
>> self.init(box.value)
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> //Adding FloatLiteralConvertible, IntegerLiteralConvertible
>>
>>
>>
>> extension FloatingPointBox where Self.BoxType == Double, Self.FloatLiteralConvertible == Double {
>>
>>
>>
>> init(floatLiteral value: Double) {
>>
>> self.init(value)
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> init(integerLiteral value: Int) {
>>
>> self.init(value)
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> init<T: IntegerType>(_ value: T) {
>>
>> self.init(value)
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> Here is my example of using the Box protocol:
>> struct Degree: FloatingPointBox {
>>
>>
>>
>> var value: Double = 0
>>
>>
>>
>> init()
>>
>> {
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> protocol DegreeConvertiable {
>>
>>
>>
>> init(degreeLiteral value: Degree)
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> extension Degree: RadianConvertiable {
>>
>>
>>
>> init(radianLiteral value: Radian) {
>>
>> self.value = Double(value) * 180.0 / M_PI
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> init(_ value: Radian) {
>>
>> self.init(radianLiteral: value)
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:24 PM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Jan 5, 2016, at 11:16 AM, Thorsten Seitz via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> Am 05.01.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Grzegorz Adam Hankiewicz via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>>:
>> >>
>> >> The ideal would be for the compiler to pretend Euros or RefTablePk are different types, yet use their parent type at the binary level. This needs a specific syntax to teach the compiler which existing methods/operations are allowed on the new fake types and which aren’t. These new distinct types would *borrow* previous implementations.
>> >
>> > What about citing the relevant protocols in the newtype definition? This should include the ability to use my own protocols to which I have made the underlying type conform to by an extension.
>>
>> This is how my forwarding proposal works. The newtype syntax I suggested as a possible extension looks like this:
>>
>> newtype Euro = Double forwarding Addable, Subtractable
>>
>> The keyword could be different, but I think `forwarding` is not bad. When I complete the second draft I think it will make even more sense. The forwarding facility has features to handle non-trivial cases (Self and associated type requirements, etc).
>>
>> >
>> > Throwing some syntax into the discussion:
>> >
>> > newtype Euro = Double : Addable, Subtractable
>> >
>> > where I have defined the protocols Addable and Subtractable somewhere and made Double conform to them if all this is not provided by the standard library.
>> > The implementation of Euro then borrows the implementation of Double for these protocols.
>> >
>> > -Thorsten
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > swift-evolution mailing list
>> > swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Wizard
>> james at supmenow.com <mailto:james at supmenow.com>
>> +44 7523 279 698
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160107/47f652ce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list