[swift-evolution] Declaring a function that always returns nil
Jeff Kelley
slaunchaman at gmail.com
Sun Jan 3 21:51:59 CST 2016
Just spit-balling here, but couldn’t you do this with a generic extension on Optional?
> extension Optional {
> func returnsNil(errorCode: Int) -> Wrapped? {
> logError(errorCode)
> return nil
> }
> }
Jeff Kelley
SlaunchaMan at gmail.com | @SlaunchaMan <https://twitter.com/SlaunchaMan> | jeffkelley.org <http://jeffkelley.org/>
> On Jan 3, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Andrew Duncan via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> It should be possible to declare a function that returns only nil, and have its return type be substitutable for any function that returns and Optional. This is something like having a bottom type but not really. What I mean is:
>
> func returnsNil(errCode:Int) -> nil {
> logError(errCode) // A side-effect. Not FP, sosumi.
> return nil
> }
>
> func returnAOptional() -> A? {
> // Bla bla. We discover an error so we decide to bail and return nil.
> return returnsNil(errCode) // Would be legal.
> }
> func returnsBOptional() -> B? {
> // Bla bla. We discover an error so we decide to bail and return nil.
> return returnsNil(errCode) // Would also be legal.
> }
>
> I seek a return type that conforms to any Optional -- I think that implies it *must* (or correct me here) be nil.
>
> Now perhaps this is already possible with wizardry from the Next Level. (There always is one.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20160103/0aa1d44e/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list