[swift-evolution] [Idea] Expression to retrieve the Objective-C selector of a method

Félix Cloutier felixcca at yahoo.ca
Mon Dec 28 12:46:04 CST 2015


Would it be possible to add properties to closures/method objects?

Right now, it's possible to write:

> @objc
> class Foo : NSObject {
> 	func doSomething(value: Int) -> Int {
> 		return value + 1
> 	}
> }
> 
> let method = Foo.doSomething

Maybe we could have Foo.doSomething.selector for @objc methods?

Félix

> Le 27 déc. 2015 à 15:55:31, Javier Soto via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> a écrit :
> 
> I would add to what Joe mentioned above the fact that the concept of "selector" may not mean a whole lot to developers who are first introduced to Swift without any prior Obj-C or Cocoa experience. Thinking of them as functions I believe avoids introducing complexity in the form of additional concepts that one must understand and differentiate ("what's a selector and why/how is it different from a function value?")
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 10:07 AM Joe Groff via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
> 
> > On Dec 26, 2015, at 11:48 PM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently, producing an Objective-C selector in Swift is an error-prone operation. One effectively just writes a string literal and uses it in a context where an ObjectiveC.Selector is expected:
> >
> >       control.sendAction(“doSomething:”, to: target, forEvent: event)
> >
> > There are many points of failure here:
> >
> > 1) The compiler doesn’t syntax-check at all to make sure it’s a valid spelling for a selector
> > 2) The compiler doesn’t look for existing methods with this selector anywhere
> > 3) The mapping from a Swift method name to an Objective-C selector isn’t always immediately obvious (especially for initializers), and will be getting significantly more complicated with the renaming work for Swift 3 (https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0005-objective-c-name-translation.md <https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0005-objective-c-name-translation.md>).
> >
> > I suggest that we add an expression ‘objc_selector(method-reference)` that produces the Objective-C selector for the named method, and produces an error if the method does not have an Objective-C entry point. For example:
> >
> >       control.sendAction(objc_selector(MyApplication.doSomething), to: target, forEvent: event)
> >
> > “doSomething” is a method of MyApplication, which might even have a completely-unrelated name in Objective-C:
> >
> >       extension MyApplication {
> >               @objc(jumpUpAndDown:)
> >               func doSomething(sender: AnyObject?) { … }
> >       }
> >
> > By naming the Swift method and having objc_selector do the work to form the Objective-C selector, we free the programming from having to do the naming translation manually and get static checking that the method exists and is exposed to Objective-C.
> >
> > This proposal composes with my “Generalized Naming for Any Function” proposal, which lets us name methods fully, including getters/setters:
> >
> >       let sel1: Selector = objc_selector(UIView.`insertSubview(_:at:)`) // produces the Selector “insertSubview:atIndex:"
> >       let sel2: Selector = objc_selector(UIView.`frame.get`) // produces the Selector “frame"
> >
> > I don’t like the `objc_selector` syntax at all, but otherwise I think this functionality is straightforward.
> 
> Selectors can be seen as "just" a kind of function value. Do we need a new syntax form at all? We ought to be able to turn an unbound function reference like UIView.insertSubview into a selector reference in Selector type context, or maybe a typed @convention(selector) function as discussed in another thread, without any explicit get-a-selector operation.
> 
> -Joe
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
> -- 
> Javier Soto  _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20151228/36bbdd7e/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-evolution mailing list