[swift-evolution] [Proposal] allow protocol extensions to contain inheritance clauses

Javier Soto javier.api at gmail.com
Fri Dec 25 22:36:40 CST 2015

I believe what you're looking for is here under "complete generics"
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:23 AM Sash Zats <sash at zats.io> wrote:

> That would be great! Is there a comprehensive list of features that made
> it under the cut?
> All I'm finding points to swift-evolution repo and API design guidelines.
> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 8:09 AM Javier Soto <javier.api at gmail.com> wrote:
>> If I understood your proposal correctly, this is already planned to be
>> possible in Swift 3 :)
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 9:05 PM Sash Zats via swift-evolution <
>> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I ran into several cases when it would be desirable to add an
>>> inheritance clause B in the protocol extension A. Briefly, my proposal is
>>> that compiler should not produce an error once `extension A: B` implements
>>> all the functions of the protocol B, making it formally confirming to it.
>>> Sadly, currently, there is no elegant way to mark the conformance formally.
>>> A more detailed draft can be found here
>>> https://gist.github.com/zats/52476a83627f5e4c0a85
>>> I would really appreciate your feedback and thoughts on this.
>>> Thank you.
>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> swift-evolution at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> --
>> Javier Soto
> --
Javier Soto
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20151226/af9498a1/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list