[swift-evolution] Proposal: Add @requires_super attribute
cullenbmacdonald at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 16:38:42 CST 2015
huge +1 from me.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Marc Knaup via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> Default behavior would require something like "unrequire" which seems odd.
> Also this would break a lot of existing code and migration can't be done
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Tino Heth via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>> A huge +1 on this — I'd actually go one step further and propose to make
>> it the default behavior:
>> Calling super rarely hurts, and it would be easier to find a better name
>> for the attribute ;-) (maybe "replaceable"…)
>> Additionally, it is one step in the right direction for those who think
>> "final" should be default (if there is any good reason to prefer final over
>> requires_super, I haven't seen it yet).
>> Instead of enforcing the call to super, it would be possible to
>> automatically run the super implementation after (or before) the overriding
>> method (unless it is explicitly called).
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution