[swift-evolution] Proposal: conversion protocol naming conventions

Matthew Johnson matthew at anandabits.com
Tue Dec 15 10:28:53 CST 2015

Bumping this thread.  There wasn’t much response to the initial post, which may have been because Saturday night is probably not the best time to post a proposal.  :)

You can find the draft here: https://github.com/anandabits/swift-evolution/blob/conversion-protocol-conventions/proposals/0000-conversion-protocol-conventions.md <https://github.com/anandabits/swift-evolution/blob/conversion-protocol-conventions/proposals/0000-conversion-protocol-conventions.md>

The little feedback I did receive was positive.


> On Dec 12, 2015, at 8:40 PM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> I have drafted a proposal to establish precise conventional meaning for the use of `Convertible`, `Representable`, and `Projectable` protocol suffixes.  The proposal would require renaming `CustomStringConvertible` and `CustomDebugStringConvertible` to `CustomStringProjectable` and `CustomDebugStringProjectable` respectively
> I am seeking input on the proposal before submitting a PR.  The full draft can found at https://github.com/anandabits/swift-evolution/blob/conversion-protocol-conventions/proposals/0000-conversion-protocol-conventions.md <https://github.com/anandabits/swift-evolution/blob/conversion-protocol-conventions/proposals/0000-conversion-protocol-conventions.md>.
> Thanks,
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20151215/6bf22e5a/attachment.html>

More information about the swift-evolution mailing list