cantrell at pobox.com
Sun Dec 13 16:00:58 CST 2015
I hit a related problem here:
I know I have an ASCII-only string because I’ve just applied escaping, but still have to force-unwrap the result of dataUsingEncoding(NSASCIIStringEncoding). Annoying!
However, I’m not sure that a new type would be a good way to solve this. A string may have many attributes that make it suitable or unsuitable for use in different situations: single line, valid identifier in a given language, no surrogate chars, no spaces … plus, of course, “valid in encoding X” for every encoding.
Handling these cases via the type system would result in a combinatorial explosion of API methods like dataUsingEncoding.
IMO, this is a perfect example of where force unwrapping is the right tool: I’m able to make guarantees about the correctness of the code that the compiler can’t verify. I’m OK with that.
• • •
If there’s a compelling use case for ASCIIString, it’s performance. In that case, I wonder whether:
• perhaps this would better be implemented as a set of extension methods on [UInt8] that do string-like things, instead of being a separate type, and
• perhaps String could — or already does — provide internal optimizations when the string is internally representable as single-byte chars.
> On Dec 13, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
> StaticString provides an "isASCII" boolean property, but manipulating strings still requires the use of UnicodeScalarView / CharacterView, even if the strings are statically known to be ASCII-only.
> I think it would be nice to have an ASCIIString in the standard library, similar to StaticString but with the following improvements:
> - ASCIIString itself would be MutableCollectionType, with Index == Int for easy access.
> - Its Generator.Element would be something which works with simple + and - operators (either UInt8, or perhaps a repurposed UnicodeScalar, or a new ASCIIScalar).
> - The ability to create new ASCIIStrings at runtime, by appending/removing bytes, or by concatenating other ASCIIStrings.
> Would anyone else find this useful?
> Jacob Bandes-Storch
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution