[swift-evolution] Proposal: conversion protocol naming conventions
matthew at anandabits.com
Sat Dec 12 21:29:56 CST 2015
Yes Arthur, you are correct. That was a copy / paste error. The second should have been `CustomDebugStringProjectable`.
I’m glad you like the proposal!
> On Dec 12, 2015, at 9:28 PM, Arthur Sabintsev <arthur at sabintsev.com> wrote:
> "The proposal would require renaming `CustomStringConvertible` and `CustomDebugStringConvertible` to `CustomStringProjectable` and `CustomStringProjectable` respectively”
> I think the second CustomStringProjectable was meant to be CustomDebugStringProjectable.
> +1 to this change as it further builds upon the protocol naming conventions that were standardized in Swift 2.0.
> Arthur / Sabintsev.com <http://sabintsev.com/>
> On December 12, 2015 at 9:40:32 PM, Matthew Johnson via swift-evolution (swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>) wrote:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution