[swift-evolution] Object declarations
Kevin Lundberg
kevin at klundberg.com
Fri Dec 11 17:13:21 CST 2015
It's an interesting idea, but I have to agree from a not-promoting-singletons standpoint. One can just add a static let to a class to return an instance and make the init private to get similar behavior.
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 5:55 PM, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> -1. Enforced singletons lead to code that can't be unit-tested. Local types are occasionally convenient and they can't be unit-tested either, but spending one extra line to name the thing isn't going to hurt. You also can't pick an initializer here (at least not in this version).
>
> IMHO, this just adds "another kind of thing" just to make code shorter, and "shorter" is not the right goal for Swift.
>
> Best,
> Jordan
>
>
>> On Dec 11, 2015, at 14:07, Marc Knaup via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> I am working on a proposal which touches (and could even partially depend on) another interesting concept which I think would be a great addition for Swift.
>>
>> Object declarations could be a way to declare a class or struct with exactly one instance. They are perfect for singletons, anonymous subclasses and to anonymously implement a protocol.
>>
>> Here some examples how it could look like:
>>
>> // singleton
>> object GlobalResource {
>> func doSomething() { … }
>> }
>>
>> let resource = GlobalResource
>>
>> // could all be the same
>> resource.doSomething()
>> GlobalResource.doSomething()
>> GlobalResource.Type.doSomething()
>>
>>
>> // anonymous subclass
>> class ViewController: UIViewController {
>>
>> override func loadView() {
>> view = object: UIView {
>> // configure view
>> }
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> // anonymous protocol implementation
>> protocol TapHandler {
>> func handleTap()
>> }
>>
>> view.tapHandler = object: TapHandler {
>> func handleTap() {
>> // …
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> Kotlin is an example for a a modern language which uses this concept:
>> https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/object-declarations.html <https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/object-declarations.html>
>>
>>
>> What do you think about such an addition?
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20151211/2f218192/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list