[swift-evolution] Proposal: Change of syntax for class protocols
Daniel Valls Estella
daniel at upzzle.com
Tue Dec 8 11:25:31 CST 2015
You are right, I was unaware of “inline” protocol composition. Nice!
But I didn’t found that you can specify class…
Although I’d prefer just to list required protocols spaceseparated.
I also think that it has to be explained as normal/basic option when explaining method declaration (not in protocols definition chapter).
> El 8 des 2015, a les 17:55, Stephen Celis <stephen.celis at gmail.com> va escriure:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Daniel Valls Estella via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
> Just to clarify.
> I think maybe it’s better to move away class constrain from protocol definitions
> and enable such type of restriction when requesting elements alongside with type/protocol conformance requirements.
> func doSomething(localvar: MyProtocol class)
> Doesn't the following work?
> func doSomething(localvar: protocol<MyProtocol, class>)
> You could, of course, use a typealias or protocol inheritance to avoid "protocol<...>".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-evolution