[swift-evolution] HTTP webserver protocol's
Simon Pilkington
simonmpilkington at icloud.com
Mon Dec 7 11:19:59 CST 2015
I agree that things like this are seperate to the stdlib but I think it would be preferable that they be controlled as part the Swift project. If you look at Java EE and their JSR specs, they are authoritative because they are part of the platform and not a loosely coupled side project. This is not to say they can’t or shouldn’t start out as side projects but I think there should be some process for bringing them in to be defined as part the Swift project.
> On 7 Dec 2015, at 8:24 AM, Lukas Stabe via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org> wrote:
>
> The [Nest project](https://github.com/nestproject/Nest <https://github.com/nestproject/Nest>) seems to aim to be something like this.
>
> While I agree that a Rack/WSGI/Plack equivalent would be benificial to have, I don’t think it fits the current goals of the stdlib (providing basic data structures and algorithms) for now.
>
> Lukas
>
>> On 07 Dec 2015, at 16:27, John Siracusa via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>>
>> The very first thing I considered writing in Swift is an implementation of Plack (http://plackperl.org/ <http://plackperl.org/>). It seems like every language benefits from having something like this (Rack in Ruby, WSGI in Python, etc.), even if only to insulate web applications from the web server implementation. I'm not sure if a language benefits from having 20 things like this, at least in the long run…
>>
>> -John
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Coen Wessels via swift-evolution <swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>> wrote:
>> Since the linux port is available everybody is implementing their own HTTP server framework https://github.com/search?utf8=✓&q=http+language%3Aswift <https://github.com/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=http+language%3Aswift>. I think introducing a default http web server protocol(swift protocol) in the stdlib, something like rack(ruby) or plug(elixir), would prevent a lot of fragmentation in interfaces.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution at swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution at swift.org>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-evolution/attachments/20151207/f12aa7fa/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-evolution
mailing list