<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:42 AM Dave Abrahams <<a href="mailto:dabrahams@apple.com">dabrahams@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
on Mon Apr 11 2016, Shawn Erickson <shawnce-AT-gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Anything to attempt on strings? I see you are considering consolidating down to<br>
> a single index type for those, etc. Of course you also imply a large string<br>
> rework that may happen in the future.<br>
<br>
Yes, Strings need the same treatment (though it may be a bit simpler<br>
since one doesn't have to unwind the broken double-indirection hack<br>
mentioned in the paper).</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I was going to start working on String indices since I had some changes stashed from a while back that make still make sense. Then I could likely help with building out tests as well. Would want to coordinate that with folks some how.</div><div><br></div><div>-Shawn</div></div></div>