<div style="white-space:pre-wrap">Anything to attempt on strings? I see you are considering consolidating down to a single index type for those, etc. Of course you also imply a large string rework that may happen in the future.<br><br>-Shawn</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 11:07 AM Dave Abrahams <<a href="mailto:dabrahams@apple.com">dabrahams@apple.com</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
on Sun Apr 10 2016, Austin Zheng <austinzheng-AT-gmail.com> wrote:<br>
<br>
> I'm really sorry for dropping the ball and disappearing off the list. I'd like<br>
> to help out if I can. I'll check out the current branch tomorrow and see what<br>
> the status of the work is, but let me know if everything is done already/there's<br>
> something in particular that should be worked on.<br>
<br>
Dmitri may have other ideas, but one thing we haven't done is to take<br>
advantage of the new model by removing references from indices. I'd<br>
like to prove that the new model does what it's supposed to. You might<br>
try simplifying the indices for Set and Dictionary. It should be<br>
possible to represent them as a wrapper around an Int.<br>
<br>
><br>
><br>
> Austin<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Shawn Erickson <<a href="mailto:shawnce@gmail.com" target="_blank">shawnce@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Anything I can help with on this effort? It looks like things are moving<br>
> along among the Apple folks. Not sure how to jump in without stepping on in<br>
> flight work, etc.<br>
><br>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:39 AM Dmitri Gribenko <<a href="mailto:gribozavr@gmail.com" target="_blank">gribozavr@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Shawn Erickson <<a href="mailto:shawnce@gmail.com" target="_blank">shawnce@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:49 PM Dmitri Gribenko <<a href="mailto:gribozavr@gmail.com" target="_blank">gribozavr@gmail.com</a>><br>
> > wrote:<br>
> >><br>
> >> Hi everyone,<br>
> >><br>
> >> I just wanted to announce that we have sufficient change on the<br>
> >> swift-3-indexing-model branch so that we can build the core standard<br>
> >> library and StdlibUnittest. We achieved this by putting the protocol<br>
> >> new structure into place, and stubbing out with fatalError() or just<br>
> >> commenting out parts that didn't compile. Now we have a baseline that<br>
> >> we won't regress, and we are starting to work towards improving it,<br>
> >> making existing tests pass, and then writing new tests, and<br>
> addressing<br>
> >> TODOs and FIXMEs that we left in the code as we were doing the first<br>
> >> pass.<br>
> >><br>
> >> Here's the most recent pull request from Shawn where he starts to fix<br>
> >> the tests: <a href="https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/1632" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/1632</a><br>
> >><br>
> >> Now we are in the "massively-parallel" stage of this project and we,<br>
> >> as always, welcome contributions to this branch!<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > FYI<br>
> ><br>
> > I am working on the following:<br>
> ><br>
> > FAIL: Swift :: 1_stdlib/StringDiagnostics.swift<br>
> > FAIL: Swift :: 1_stdlib/StringDiagnostics_without_Foundation.swift<br>
> > ...and looking at converting String.XxxxIndexes to the new index style<br>
> while<br>
> > maintaining existing public API.<br>
><br>
> There doesn't seem to be many tests actively failing in the primary<br>
> testsuite, so I'll be working on making StdlibCollectionUnittest<br>
> compile, which will allow us to run the validation testsuite.<br>
><br>
> Dmitri<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if<br>
> (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <<a href="mailto:gribozavr@gmail.com" target="_blank">gribozavr@gmail.com</a>>*/<br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
Dave<br>
</blockquote></div>