[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #114
Joe Shajrawi
shajrawi at apple.com
Tue Aug 29 19:59:14 CDT 2017
This PR should fix it: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/11686 <https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/11686>
Regards,
—Joe | | 📧 shajrawi at apple.com <mailto:shajrawi at apple.com> | 📱(+1) 408-930-5203
> On Aug 29, 2017, at 16:27, Joe Shajrawi <shajrawi at apple.com> wrote:
>
> My commit might have uncovered an old bug in eraseUsesOfInstruction by changing which large-types are expanded in the optimizer, but it did not cause this underlying problem:
>
> There’s a bug in the recursive eraser’s logic that, in rare occasions, deletes a ‘user’ that’s yet to be iterated over in the Instruction’s users loop. This caused the compiler to crash.
>
> Last week I upstream a commit that worked around this issue by adding the following check:
> if (!User) {
> continue;
> }
>
> I am assuming ASAN is hitting this issue now.
>
>
> Regards,
> —Joe | | 📧 shajrawi at apple.com <mailto:shajrawi at apple.com> | 📱(+1) 408-930-5203
>
>
>
>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Michael Ilseman <milseman at apple.com <mailto:milseman at apple.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Asan is detecting a use after free. Michael G or Joe, is this likely either of you?
>>
>> SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free (/Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/buildbot_incremental_asan/swift-macosx-x86_64/bin/swift:x86_64+0x101bc796c) in swift::eraseUsesOfInstruction(swift::SILInstruction*, std::__1::function<void (swift::SILInstruction*)>)
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 29, 2017, at 4:15 PM, no-reply at swift.org <mailto:no-reply at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx [#114]
>>>
>>> Build URL: https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/114/ <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/114/>
>>> Project: oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx
>>> Date of build: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:26:15 -0500
>>> Build duration: 1 hr 50 min
>>>
>>> Changes
>>>
>>> Commit 58fefc174cb6fade894c9c9349dbf34bab7f34a6 by mgottesman:
>>> [sil-ownership] is_nonnull does not take trivial values, it takes
>>>
>>> edit: test/SIL/ownership-verifier/use_verifier.sil
>>> edit: lib/SIL/SILOwnershipVerifier.cpp
>>>
>>> Commit fb1b2a8d9d2277a53c7b1bc76f983ccd38b9f925 by shajrawi:
>>> Use emitCopy/Destroy value instead of LoweredCopy/Destroy for large
>>>
>>> edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Transforms/SILLowerAggregateInstrs.cpp
>>> edit: lib/SILOptimizer/Transforms/SILMem2Reg.cpp
>>> edit: lib/SIL/TypeLowering.cpp
>>>
>>> Commit 5c65887fd00e99237eb1032634249634e8a7a236 by xi_ge:
>>> [SourceKit] Add function argument when optional chaining is used
>>>
>>> edit: lib/IDE/SyntaxModel.cpp
>>> edit: test/IDE/structure.swift
>>> edit: test/SourceKit/DocumentStructure/structure.swift.response
>>> edit: test/SourceKit/DocumentStructure/Inputs/main.swift
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/attachments/20170829/496c1ab6/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-dev
mailing list