[swift-dev] SR-122 / CollectionsMoveIndices.swift Prototype

[Austin Zheng]

Excellent! I'll begin working on this today.

Austin

> On Apr 11, 2016, at 11:07 AM, Dave Abrahams <dabrahams at apple.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> on Sun Apr 10 2016, Austin Zheng <austinzheng-AT-gmail.com <http://austinzheng-at-gmail.com/>> wrote:
> 
>> I'm really sorry for dropping the ball and disappearing off the list. I'd like
>> to help out if I can. I'll check out the current branch tomorrow and see what
>> the status of the work is, but let me know if everything is done already/there's
>> something in particular that should be worked on.
> 
> Dmitri may have other ideas, but one thing we haven't done is to take
> advantage of the new model by removing references from indices.  I'd
> like to prove that the new model does what it's supposed to.  You might
> try simplifying the indices for Set and Dictionary.  It should be
> possible to represent them as a wrapper around an Int.
> 
>> 
>> 
>> Austin
>> 
>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Shawn Erickson <shawnce at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>    Anything I can help with on this effort? It looks like things are moving
>>    along among the Apple folks. Not sure how to jump in without stepping on in
>>    flight work, etc.
>> 
>>    On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 1:39 AM Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>    On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Shawn Erickson <shawnce at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:49 PM Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>> 
>>>> I just wanted to announce that we have sufficient change on the
>>>> swift-3-indexing-model branch so that we can build the core standard
>>>> library and StdlibUnittest. We achieved this by putting the protocol
>>>> new structure into place, and stubbing out with fatalError() or just
>>>> commenting out parts that didn't compile. Now we have a baseline that
>>>> we won't regress, and we are starting to work towards improving it,
>>>> making existing tests pass, and then writing new tests, and
>>        addressing
>>>> TODOs and FIXMEs that we left in the code as we were doing the first
>>>> pass.
>>>> 
>>>> Here's the most recent pull request from Shawn where he starts to fix
>>>> the tests: https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/1632
>>>> 
>>>> Now we are in the "massively-parallel" stage of this project and we,
>>>> as always, welcome contributions to this branch!
>>> 
>>> 
>>> FYI
>>> 
>>> I am working on the following:
>>> 
>>> FAIL: Swift :: 1_stdlib/StringDiagnostics.swift
>>> FAIL: Swift :: 1_stdlib/StringDiagnostics_without_Foundation.swift
>>> ...and looking at converting String.XxxxIndexes to the new index style
>>        while
>>> maintaining existing public API.
>> 
>>        There doesn't seem to be many tests actively failing in the primary
>>        testsuite, so I'll be working on making StdlibCollectionUnittest
>>        compile, which will allow us to run the validation testsuite.
>> 
>>        Dmitri
>> 
>>        --
>>        main(i,j){for(i=2;;i++){for(j=2;j<i;j++){if(!(i%j)){j=0;break;}}if
>>        (j){printf("%d\n",i);}}} /*Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com>*/
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/attachments/20160411/81915f26/attachment.html>