[swift-dev] Categorization of warnings in Swift
Michael Gottesman
mgottesman at apple.com
Tue Jan 12 19:06:46 CST 2016
> On Jan 12, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Michael Ilseman via swift-dev <swift-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>
> Hello, I'm interested in enabling finer-grained control over warning/error
> reporting ala Clang. I've started to put in some infrastructure to
> DiagnosticEngine, and now I'm at the point of determining categorization.
>
> I'd like some input (and maybe even some bikeshedding!) on the community's
> thoughts and preferences here. Here's my take on the issue:
>
> When it comes to defining the categorization, I can see a few approaches:
> Categorize based on broad language-feature/compiler-area. E.g. "Availability" or “CommandLineArguments”
> Categorize based on the kind of warning. E.g. "Deprecated" or “Uninitialized"
> Categorize based on severity or specificity of warnings. E.g. "Pedantic" or "UnusedValue" or "NullDereference"
>
> And, of course, I think that preference should be given to how people would
> actively like to use the categories to control warnings. For example, there's
> a handful of warnings that makes less sense in a REPL or rapid experimentation
> environment, such as variable_never_mutated.
>
> Here's a straw-man proposal of some categorization. Of course, one developer's
> annoying pedantic warning is another's life-saving code-smell detector. I am not
> personally tied to these categorizations at all, I'm just interested in there
> being something simple and basic. Below is a list of every warning in Swift with
> an attempt to put it under a category.
>
>
> Deprecated:
> var_not_allowed_in_pattern
> "Use of '%select{var|let}0' binding here is deprecated and will be "
> "removed in a future version of Swift"
> deprecated_c_style_for_stmt
> "C-style for statement is deprecated and will be removed in a future "
> "version of Swift"
> deprecated_convention_attribute
> "'@%0' attribute is deprecated; '@convention(%1)' should be used "
> "instead"
> availability_deprecated
> "%0 %select{is|%select{is|was}3}1 deprecated"
> "%select{| %select{on|in}3 %2%select{| %4}3}1"
> availability_deprecated_msg
> "%0 %select{is|%select{is|was}3}1 deprecated"
> "%select{| %select{on|in}3 %2%select{| %4}3}1: %5"
> availability_deprecated_rename
> "%0 %select{is|%select{is|was}3}1 deprecated"
> "%select{| %select{on|in}3 %2%select{| %4}3}1: renamed to '%5'"
> parameter_curry_syntax_removed
> "curried function declaration syntax will be removed in a future "
> "version of Swift; use a single parameter list"
>
>
> Unsupported:
> warning_parallel_execution_not_supported
> "parallel execution not supported; falling back to serial execution"
> unsupported_synthesize_init_variadic
> "synthesizing a variadic inherited initializer for subclass %0 is "
> "unsupported"
>
>
> Stylistic/Pedantic/Cleanliness:
> pbd_never_used_stmtcond
> "value %0 was defined but never used; consider replacing "
> "with boolean test"
> pbd_never_used
> "initialization of %select{variable|immutable value}1 %0 was never used"
> "; consider replacing with assignment to '_' or removing it"
> capture_never_used
> "capture %0 was never used",
> variable_never_used
> "%select{variable|immutable value}1 %0 was never used; "
> "consider replacing with '_' or removing it"
> variable_never_mutated
> "%select{variable|parameter}1 %0 was never mutated; "
> "consider changing to 'let' constant"
> variable_never_read
> "%select{variable|parameter}1 %0 was written to, but never read"
> expression_unused_result
> "result of call to %0 is unused"
> expression_unused_init_result
> "result of initializer is unused", ())
> expression_unused_result_message
> "result of call to %0 is unused: %1"
> expression_unused_result_nonmutating
> "result of call to non-mutating function %0 is unused; "
> "use %1 to mutate in-place"
> expression_unused_optional_try
> "result of 'try?' is unused"
> non_trailing_closure_before_default_args
> "closure parameter prior to parameters with default arguments will "
> "not be treated as a trailing closure"
> parameter_extraneous_double_up
> "extraneous duplicate parameter name; %0 already has an argument "
> "label"
> parameter_extraneous_empty_name
> "extraneous '_' in parameter: %0 has no keyword argument name"
> escaped_parameter_name
> "keyword '%0' does not need to be escaped in argument list"
>
>
> CodeSmell/StrongStylisticHints:
> guard_always_succeeds
> "'guard' condition is always true, body is unreachable"
> warn_unqualified_access
> "use of %0 treated as a reference to %1 in %2 %3"
> var_pattern_didnt_bind_variables
> "'%0' pattern has no effect; sub-pattern didn't bind any variables"
> type_inferred_to_undesirable_type
> "%select{variable|constant}2 %0 inferred to have type %1, "
> "which may be unexpected"
> no_throw_in_try
> "no calls to throwing functions occur within 'try' expression"
> no_throw_in_do_with_catch
> "'catch' block is unreachable because no errors are thrown in 'do' block"
> required_initializer_override_keyword
> "'override' is implied when overriding a required initializer"
> if_always_true
> "'if' condition is always true"
> while_always_true
> "'while' condition is always true"
> warn_protocol_witness_optionality
> "%select{type|result|parameter|parameters|"
> "result and parameters}0 of %1 %select{has|has|has|have|have|}0"
> " different optionality than expected by protocol %2"
> optional_req_nonobjc_near_match
> "non- at objc %select{initializer %1|method %1|property %1|subscript}0 "
> "cannot satisfy optional requirement of @objc protocol %2"
> override_unnecessary_IUO
> "overriding %0 parameter of type %1 with implicitly unwrapped optional "
> "type %2",
> override_unnecessary_result_IUO
> "overriding %0 optional result type %1 with implicitly unwrapped "
> "optional type %2",
> inject_forced_downcast, sema_tce, none,
> "treating a forced downcast to %0 as optional will never produce 'nil'"
> recursive_accessor_reference, tce_sema, none,
> "attempting to %select{access|modify}1 %0 within its own "
> "%select{getter|setter}1",
> store_in_willset, tce_sema, none,
> "attempting to store to property %0 within its own willSet, which is "
> "about to be overwritten by the new value",
> isa_is_always_true
> "'%0' test is always true",
> conditional_downcast_coercion
> "conditional cast from %0 to %1 always succeeds"
> downcast_to_unrelated, sema_tcc, none,
> "cast from %0 to unrelated type %1 always fails"
> forced_downcast_noop
> "forced cast of %0 to same type has no effect"
> forced_downcast_coercion
> "forced cast from %0 to %1 always succeeds; did you mean to use 'as'?"
> extraneous_default_args_in_call
> "call to %0 has extraneous arguments that could use defaults"
> unreachable_code
> "will never be executed"
> unreachable_code_after_stmt
> "code after '%select{return|break|continue|throw}0' will never "
> "be executed"
> unreachable_case
> "%select{case|default}0 will never be executed"
> switch_on_a_constant
> "switch condition evaluates to a constant"
> integer_conversion_overflow_warn
> "integer overflows when converted from %0 to %1"
> integer_literal_overflow_warn
> "integer literal overflows when stored into %0"
> trailing_closure_excess_newlines
> "trailing closure is separated from call site by multiple newlines"
> lex_nul_character, lexing, none
> "nul character embedded in middle of file"
> unindented_code_after_return
> "expression following 'return' is treated as an argument of "
> "the 'return'"
> lex_editor_placeholder_in_playground
> "editor placeholder in source file"
>
>
> Attributes:
> attr_availability_unknown_platform
> "unknown platform '%0' for attribute '%1'"
> attr_warn_unused_result_expected_name
> "expected parameter 'message' or 'mutable_variant'"
> attr_warn_unused_result_duplicate_parameter
> "duplicate '%0' parameter; previous value will be ignored"
> attr_warn_unused_result_unknown_parameter
> "unknown parameter '%0' in 'warn_unused_result' attribute"
> attr_migration_id_expected_name
> "expected parameter 'pattern'"
> attr_migration_id_unknown_parameter
> "unknown parameter '%0' in '_migration_id' attribute"
> attr_migration_id_duplicate_parameter
> "duplicate '%0' parameter; previous value will be ignored"
> invalid_swift_name_method
> "too %select{few|many}0 parameters in swift_name attribute (expected %1; "
> "got %2)"
>
> Availability:
> availability_query_useless_min_deployment
> "unnecessary check for '%0'; minimum deployment target ensures guard "
> "will always be true"
> availability_query_useless_enclosing_scope
> "unnecessary check for '%0'; enclosing scope ensures guard "
> "will always be true"
>
> And the below I'm either struggling to think about how to categorize them
> (perhaps no category at first), or un-familiar with what they're targeting
> warning_from_clang:
> "%0"
> could_not_rewrite_bridging_header, none, none,
> "failed to serialize bridging header; "
> "target may not be debuggable outside of its original project"
> omit_needless_words
> "%0 could be named %1 [-Womit-needless-words]"
> unused_compiler_version_component
> "the second version component is not used for comparison"
> unknown_build_config
> "unknown %0 for build configuration '%1'"
> sema_import_current_module
> "this file is part of module %0; ignoring import"
> sema_import_current_module_with_file
> "file '%0' is part of module %1; ignoring import"
> access_control_member_more
> "declaring %select{PRIVATE|an internal|a public}0 %1 for "
> "%select{a private|an internal|PUBLIC}2 %3"
> access_control_ext_member_more
> "declaring %select{PRIVATE|an internal|a public}0 %1 in "
> "%select{a private|an internal|PUBLIC}2 extension"
> emit_reference_dependencies_without_primary_file
> "ignoring -emit-reference-dependencies (requires -primary-file)"
> warning_no_such_sdk
> "no such SDK: '%0'"
> warn_cannot_stat_input
> "unable to determine when '%0' was last modified: %1"
> warning_unnecessary_repl_mode
> "unnecessary option '%0'; this is the default for '%1' "
> "with no input files"
> incremental_requires_output_file_map
> "ignoring -incremental (currently requires an output file map)"
> incremental_requires_build_record_entry
> "ignoring -incremental; output file map has no master dependencies "
> "entry (\"%0\" under \"\")"
>
> I haven’t gotten to how to expose this to the user, and I’ll defer to the community for suggestions in that area.
Just an FYI: We have also talked about performance related warnings at the SIL level (that could potentially be a hard error). We do not have any such thing implemented right now, but keep it in mind.
Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-dev mailing list
> swift-dev at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/attachments/20160112/104c2a5d/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-dev
mailing list