<font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"><div>Hi Tony, </div><div><br></div><div>PRs 911 and 913 reminded me of this conversation you started. </div><div><br></div><div>The current unit testing infrastructure for URLSession may prove insufficient for future contributions. I've been looking at these <a target="_blank" href="https://github.com/mike-ferenduros/swift-corelibs-foundation/blob/more-urlsession-tests/TestFoundation/TestNSURLSession.swift " title="https://github.com/mike-ferenduros/swift-corelibs-foundation/blob/more-urlsession-tests/TestFoundation/TestNSURLSession.swift ">tests</a> written by Mike Ferenduros and they appear quite exhaustive! The only issue is that they connect to an external HTTP test service - <a href="http://httpbin.org." target="_blank">http://httpbin.org.</a> </div><div><br></div><div>A quick look at httpbin.org tells me it has sufficient functionality to aid in URLSession unit testing. Do you think it would make sense to emulate this functionality within TestFoundation?</div><div><br></div><div><font face="Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"><font><font><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr"><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr"><div class="socmaildefaultfont" dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr" style="font-style: normal;"><br><font face="Sans Serif, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Pushkar N Kulkarni,</font></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-style: normal;"><font face="Sans Serif, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">IBM Runtimes</font></div><div dir="ltr" style="font-style: normal;"><font face="Sans Serif, Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div dir="ltr"><font face="serif, Times New Roman, Times, serif"><i>Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability - Edsger W. Dijkstra</i></font></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="font-style: normal; font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Arial;"><br></div></div></div></div></font></font></font></div><br><br><font face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2" color="#000000"><font color="#990099"><a href="mailto:-----swift-corelibs-dev-bounces@swift.org" target="_blank">-----swift-corelibs-dev-bounces@swift.org</a> wrote: -----</font><div class="iNotesHistory" style="padding-left:5px;"><div style="padding-right:0px;padding-left:5px;border-left:solid black 2px;">To: swift-corelibs-dev <<a href="mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org</a>><br>From: Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org><br>Sent by: <a href="mailto:swift-corelibs-dev-bounces@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-corelibs-dev-bounces@swift.org</a><br>Date: 01/25/2017 01:13AM<br>Subject: [swift-corelibs-dev] URLSession test fest!<br><br><div><font face="Courier New,Courier,monospace" size="3">Hi everyone,<br><br>As we’re wrapping up Swift 3.1, I think it’d be a great opportunity to have a quality focus area on one of our most important APIs: URLSession. If you’ve been wondering how to make a meaningful contribution, this is the perfect time.<br><br>It’d be great to greatly expand both unit test and higher level test coverage of URLSession. For testing that can’t really be part of a unit test and CI like poorly performing networks or esoteric configurations, it would also be nice to build a different kind of test tool. That tool would provide a lot of knobs for controlling a URLSession. We could make this tool part of the swift-corelibs-foundation project.<br><br>Is anyone interested in chipping in here? We don’t have to start big. Even small contributions could get us moving in the right direction.<br><br>Thanks,<br>- Tony<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>swift-corelibs-dev mailing list<br><a href="mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org" target="_blank">swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org</a><br><a href="https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev">https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev</a><br></font></div></swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org></div></div></font></font><BR>