[swift-corelibs-dev] Duplicate definition of va_list on Arm
anthony.parker at apple.com
Fri Aug 19 15:42:22 CDT 2016
One of the challenges we have in removing imports in public headers is that other projects are importing those headers transitively. Someone else may be assuming they get stdio.h by importing CoreFoundation.h or dispatch.h, and using something from that header.
> On Aug 19, 2016, at 11:53 AM, William Dillon via swift-corelibs-dev <swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
> In corelibs-foundation project we've been using a patch based on https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/399/files <https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/399/files> for quite some time (summary: remove #include <stdio.h>). The PR hasn't gotten any where for various reasons. Currently, I've gotten libdispatch working on arm, but it requires a fix that's essentially identical. It is part of a PR available here: https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-libdispatch/pull/155 <https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-libdispatch/pull/155>
> I'd like to get this moving forward in both cases, and I'd like to bring it to the list. What exactly is stdio.h bringing in? I realize the comment identifies __off_t, but at least on arm that's being provided elsewhere. Furthermore, __off_t is defined in several places.
> Are there any suggestions for what a satisfactory solution would be to address the duplicate definition of va_list on arm that does not negatively impact other platforms?
> - Will
> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the swift-corelibs-dev