[swift-corelibs-dev] Wrapping up Swift 3 for swift-corelibs

[Brian Gesiak]

I think a future release is prudent, for the following reasons:

1. swift-corelibs-xctest requires users to list each of their tests in an
`allTests` static property. However, this isn't source-incompatible with
Darwin XCTest. A developer could include the list on Darwin, and their
tests would still compile and run just fine.
2. We decided back in May that [this feature should be implemented by using
SourceKit](
https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-dev/Week-of-Mon-20160502/001940.html).
Although while SourceKit can technically now be compiled for Linux, it has
a dependency upon libdispatch. To build it, we need to refactor the build
system to (1) first build the Swift compiler and stdlib, (2) then build
libdispatch, (3) finally build SourceKit. I'm not certain that can be done
by August 18th (although I'd love to hear from anyone who disagrees!).
3. Even if we were able to complete step (2), we'd still have to integrate
that feature into swift-corelibs-xctest and SwiftPM, which will no doubt
take some additional time.

Still, I'm looking forward to this being shipped this in Swift 3.x!

- Brian Gesiak


On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Tony Parker <anthony.parker at apple.com>
wrote:

> Hm, I’ll have to defer to Mike on the status of this one.
>
> If it’s not in place now, we should probably schedule it for a future
> release.
>
> - Tony
>
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Brian Gesiak <modocache at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the heads up, Tony!
>
> (+cc corelibs-xctest release manager Mike Ferris)
> Just to confirm, we are not resolving https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-710,
> "Generate XCTestCaseProvider entries on Linux", in time for the Swift 3
> release. Is this correct?
>
> - Brian Gesiak
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev <
> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Gonzalo,
>>
>> While not a complete solution for the issues around bridging, the work on
>> id-as-Any that I mentioned below was meant to help address these platform
>> differences.
>>
>> For example, let’s say you had a Foundation API that looked like this in
>> ObjC:
>>
>> - (void)foo:(id)x;
>>
>> and imported like this into Swift:
>>
>> func foo(_ x : AnyObject)
>>
>> On Linux, attempting to call this:
>>
>> bar.foo(“hello”)
>>
>> would result in an error, because String is not an object type. On
>> Darwin, String was implicitly bridged to NSString here for you.
>>
>> Now (hopefully — I’m still working on verifying this), the above is
>> imported like this:
>>
>> func foo(_ x : Any)
>>
>> which means that on Linux, this should actually work:
>>
>> bar.foo(“hello”)
>>
>> because String is indeed an Any. No need to do something like
>> “hello”.bridge().
>>
>> AnyHashable also helps. because we should be able to express API which
>> takes untyped dictionaries with AnyHashable keys instead of NSObject keys.
>>
>> Most of this stuff has only landed in the last week or two, so if you can
>> give it a try and let us know how well it works out, that would be great.
>>
>> - Tony
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0116-id-as-any.md
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0131-anyhashable.md
>>
>>
>> On Jul 29, 2016, at 11:06 AM, Gonzalo Larralde <gonzalolarralde at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Wanted to know if there's any plan to find a solution for Auto Bridging
>> between corelibs-foundation <> Swift types in the same manner as it is done
>> for Obj-C.
>>
>> There has been some discussions about this in the following PRs:
>>
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/310
>> https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/303
>> https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/1994
>>
>> The inclusion of this feature will allow more non-UIKit related packages
>> to be used with almost  no changes.
>>
>> For what I understand the main blocker here is getting this to pass
>> through Swift review (probably a more generic version of it, like
>> _BridgeableType instead of _ObjectiveCBridgeable would help?), but wanted
>> to understand first if this is a priority for the foundation team, and
>> there is something that can be done to push for this feature.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Slds,
>>
>> Gonzalo.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Matt Wright via swift-corelibs-dev <
>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>>
>>> The overlay changes were merged to corelibs libdispatch this morning.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone.
>>>
>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 2:03 PM, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev <
>>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> I don’t believe anyone is looking into this. If you want to do that, I
>>> think now would be the time!
>>>
>>> - Tony
>>>
>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:50 AM, David P Grove via swift-corelibs-dev <
>>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Tony Parker wrote on 07/28/2016 01:41:55 PM:
>>> >
>>> > 1. Integrate swift-corelibs-dispatch into Foundation.
>>>
>>> Hi Tony,
>>>
>>> Hopefully this is on the task list already, but if it isn't we should
>>> add it before it gets to be too late to change the compiler...
>>>
>>> When compiling a Swift program on Linux that imports Dispatch (or
>>> Foundation once the integration is done), the user has to give the extra
>>> compilation flags -Xcc -fblocks to enable block support.
>>>
>>> We really need to land a change somewhere so that either (1) blocks
>>> support is always on for Linux or (2) importing Dispatch or Foundation
>>> automatically turns on blocks support.
>>>
>>> I have some time today and tomorrow that I could use to work on this if
>>> no one is handling it already, but I'm not sure how best to tackle the
>>> problem.  Suggestions?
>>>
>>> --dave
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
>>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
>>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
>>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
>>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-corelibs-dev/attachments/20160730/72272d7f/attachment.html>