[swift-corelibs-dev] Internal Tests

[Tony Parker]

Using @testable makes sense to me. Let's try it out. 

- Tony

> On Mar 15, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Robert Stephen Thompson via swift-corelibs-dev <swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> If it doesn’t use it on Linux, it’s because I was mostly running tests in Xcode heh, and didn’t end up needing it in the end. On Linux, of course, I think you’d want @testable import Foundation. I’m not an Apple guy, though, I just happen to be the guy who wrote TestNSXMLDocument.swift! So if there is actually a reason not to use it, I’m not aware of it, but don’t necessarily take my word for it!
> 
> Thanks,
> Robert Thompson
> Software Engineer
> WillowTree, Inc.®
> willowtreeapps.com
> 
>> On Mar 15, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Daniel Eggert via swift-corelibs-dev <swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Is it ok to use
>>    @testable import SwiftFoundation
>> in tests? I'd like to test some internal code.
>> 
>> TestNSXMLDocument.swift uses this, but not on Linux. What's the reason for this?
>> 
>> /Daniel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
>> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-corelibs-dev/attachments/20160315/496deef0/attachment.html>