[swift-corelibs-dev] NSRegularExpression.firstMatchInString() fails on Linux
Tony Parker
anthony.parker at apple.com
Thu Mar 3 12:22:03 CST 2016
Hi Mamatha,
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:57 AM, Mamatha Busi via swift-corelibs-dev <swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> The following test case, that currently fails on Linux, is extracted from some of the excluded tests inside TestFoundation/TestNSRegularExpression.
>
> import Foundation
>
> let searchStr = "123"
> let testRegex = try NSRegularExpression.init(pattern: "a(b|c|d)(x|y|z)*|123", options: [])
> let firstMatch = testRegex.firstMatchInString(searchStr, options: [], range: NSMakeRange(0,3))
>
> if NSEqualRanges((firstMatch!.rangeAtIndex(1), NSMakeRange(NSNotFound,0)) {
> print("Test passed")
> } else {
> print("First match first capture range = \(NSStringFromRange(firstMatch!.rangeAtIndex(1)))")
> print("Test failed")
> }
>
>
>
> In the above scenario, no capture group participates in the match. So, firstMatch.rangeAtIndex(1) should ideally return range {NSNotFound, 0} but the actual returned value is range {-1, 0}. Hence the failure.
>
> Debugging on the CoreFoundation, it is observed that the value -1 is coming from 'kCFNotFound' which is defined as -1. On the Foundation side, 'NSNotFound' is defined with the value of ‘Int.max’ (which must be Int32.max and Int64.max on 32 and 64 bit platforms respectively).
>
> There are a couple of queries that I have:
>
> -> Is 'NSNotFound' in Foundation mapped to 'kCFNotFound' in CoreFoundation?
>
> -> If so, then why do 'NSNotFound' and 'kCFNotFound' have different values on the Foundation and CoreFoundation respectively?
>
They don’t have the same value; we translate it manually in most places.
> Also, I tested by modifying the 'kCFNotFound' value in CoreFoundation/Base.subproj/CFBase.h (See below code snippet):
>
> #if TARGET_RT_64_BIT
> static const CFIndex kCFNotFound = LONG_MAX;
> #else
> static const CFIndex kCFNotFound = INT_MAX;
> #endif
>
>
> With this change the above mentioned test-case passes but a lot of other TestFoundation tests seem to fail.
>
> Please provide your comments on the appropriate change that is needed here.
>
> Thank you.
I think we probably just need to check the result from the CF function and translate it into an NSNotFound in this one particular case.
Thanks,
- Tony
>
> Regards
> Mamatha
> Mamatha Busi
> <Mail Attachment.gif>
> Java L3 Support
> IBM Software Group
> India Software Labs
>
>
> e-mail: mamabusi at in.ibm.com
> Java Technology India Group <http://bit.ly/a7KpQj>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-corelibs-dev/attachments/20160303/f95dbfeb/attachment.html>
More information about the swift-corelibs-dev
mailing list