[swift-corelibs-dev] NSRegularExpression.firstMatchInString() fails on Linux

Tony Parker anthony.parker at apple.com
Thu Mar 3 12:22:03 CST 2016


Hi Mamatha,

> On Mar 2, 2016, at 3:57 AM, Mamatha Busi via swift-corelibs-dev <swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello
> 
> The following test case, that currently fails on Linux,  is extracted from some of the excluded tests inside TestFoundation/TestNSRegularExpression. 
> 
> import Foundation
> 
> let searchStr = "123"
> let testRegex = try NSRegularExpression.init(pattern: "a(b|c|d)(x|y|z)*|123", options: [])
> let firstMatch = testRegex.firstMatchInString(searchStr, options: [], range: NSMakeRange(0,3))
> 
> if NSEqualRanges((firstMatch!.rangeAtIndex(1), NSMakeRange(NSNotFound,0)) {
>     print("Test passed")
> } else {
>     print("First match first capture range = \(NSStringFromRange(firstMatch!.rangeAtIndex(1)))")
>     print("Test failed")
> }
> 
> 
> 
> In the above scenario, no capture group participates in the match. So, firstMatch.rangeAtIndex(1) should ideally return range {NSNotFound, 0} but the actual returned value is range {-1, 0}. Hence the failure.
> 
> Debugging on the CoreFoundation, it is observed that the value -1 is coming from 'kCFNotFound' which is defined as -1. On the Foundation side, 'NSNotFound' is defined with the value of ‘Int.max’ (which must be Int32.max and Int64.max on 32 and 64 bit platforms respectively).
> 
> There are a couple of queries that I have:
> 
> -> Is 'NSNotFound' in Foundation mapped  to 'kCFNotFound'  in CoreFoundation?
> 
> -> If so, then why do 'NSNotFound' and 'kCFNotFound' have different values on the Foundation and CoreFoundation respectively?
> 

They don’t have the same value; we translate it manually in most places.

> Also, I tested by modifying the 'kCFNotFound' value in CoreFoundation/Base.subproj/CFBase.h  (See below code snippet):
> 
> #if TARGET_RT_64_BIT
> static const CFIndex kCFNotFound = LONG_MAX;
> #else
> static const CFIndex kCFNotFound = INT_MAX;
> #endif
> 
> 
> With this change the above mentioned test-case passes but a lot of other TestFoundation tests seem to fail.
> 
> Please provide your comments on the appropriate change that is needed here. 
> 
> Thank you.

I think we probably just need to check the result from the CF function and translate it into an NSNotFound in this one particular case.

Thanks,
- Tony

> 
> Regards
> Mamatha
> Mamatha Busi		
> <Mail Attachment.gif>
> Java L3 Support	
> IBM Software Group	 
> India Software Labs	 	
>  	
>  	
> e-mail:	mamabusi at in.ibm.com	 	
> Java Technology India Group <http://bit.ly/a7KpQj>	 	
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list
> swift-corelibs-dev at swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.swift.org/pipermail/swift-corelibs-dev/attachments/20160303/f95dbfeb/attachment.html>


More information about the swift-corelibs-dev mailing list